The Rangers had a slow start to McGinnis’ reign, but there was good reason to be patient. A team in transition, teething problems with tactics and the need for continuity all shape the bigger picture.
With Derek McInnes four games into charge at Rangers, it would be easy to conclude that something has gone wrong with the appointment.
The Rangers are winless. They have taken just one point from their first two Premier League games, were knocked out of the Europa League by Jagiellonian Bialystok, and currently find themselves under intense pressure from support that has had enough false dawns.
But perhaps the biggest mistake Rangers could make now is repeating the behavior that has caused their problems in recent years: panicking.
McGinnis definitely deserves criticism for some aspects of what we’ve seen. The performance was not good enough, the team lacked balance and his tactical decisions have been questioned. But judging him after four games while asking him to rebuild a massively revamped team risks missing out on the bigger picture.
There is a compelling argument to be made that Derek McGinnis is still the type of coach the Rangers need.
This is not the final Rangers team
The most important context is that McInnis inherited a team in transition.
Nine new players have joined since mid-August, including Lawrence Shankland, Ivor Pandure, Ben Godfrey, Ross McCrory, Kami Devlin, Dan Neal, Daisuke Yokota, Vanja Dragojevic and Olbertu Mahagna. James Penrith joined on loan following an injury to Toul Lomens.
This is not simply adding two or three players to an established squad. It is trying to form a new team and compete in both the European qualifiers and the Premier League.
And the recruiting isn’t over yet.
McInnes has openly stated his desire to add more players, with Kuhaib Derioeihe’s medical failure and injuries to players such as Youssef Cermiti and Romans further complicating his plans.
This is important.
When the product itself is still being assembled, managers cannot make an unbiased judgment based on the finished product.
Stability is more important than another reset
The decision to appoint McInnes was largely based on his achievements at Hearts.
He guided Hearts to second place last season, eight points ahead of Rangers, and led the way until the final day. It was an extraordinary campaign, given the resources he had at his disposal.
Wanderers are not suddenly appointing a manager without evidence of his ability to build a competitive team.
They have appointed a manager who has proven he can organize a team, improve players, set standards and consistently deliver results.
Those qualities have not disappeared as his first month at Ibrox has been difficult.
Indeed, the challenge now is whether Rangers give him enough time to reproduce those qualities at a bigger club.
This is arguably the strongest reason to stick with McGinnis.
The Rangers spent several years changing head coaches and changing direction.
Russell Martin only lasted four months before being fired in October 2025. Danilol then arrived, only to leave less than eight months later to join Red Bull Salzburg. McInnis was appointed in June on a three-year deal.
At some point, the Rangers have to stop looking at every disappointing game as evidence that the entire project needs to be torn apart.
The club needs continuity.
McInnis needs to know he has the opportunity to develop his squad, establish his football identity and understand the role within the Wanderers squad. Players need to know they are playing for a coach who will still be there next season. Recruiting needs to be aligned with the long-term vision rather than constantly adapting to the preferences of other managers.
This is how successful clubs are built.
Firing McGinnis after a few games would only start the cycle over again.
Tactical criticism is fair but can be fixed
There’s another reason to be patient: McGinnis has proven he can compete under pressure.
Hearts’ second-place finish was no accident.
He inherited a club with far fewer resources than Rangers and successfully propelled them into genuine title contention. Meanwhile, Rangers are third, eight points behind Hearts.
That doesn’t mean McInnes will win the premiership at Ibrox.
But it does show that he understands Scottish football, how to build a competitive team and how to get players to perform beyond expectations.
These are exactly the attributes the Rangers should be looking for.
There is a legitimate argument that McGinnis is mistaken.
Andy Halliday criticized Rangers’ midfield balance and questioned the rigidity of the 4-4-2 system, arguing the team can become predictable and vulnerable when in possession.
These criticisms should not be dismissed simply because McGinnis needs time.
The Rangers head coach has to be able to adapt.
But the tactical issues after four games are fundamentally different from evidence that the manager is incapable of managing Rangers.
McInnis has shown throughout his career that he can tailor his teams to his personnel. The real test will be whether he can learn from these early issues and find a structure that can get the best out of players such as Dan Neal, Daisuke Yokota, Laurence Shankland and returning injured players.
The answer may not be the formation the Rangers started with.
It doesn’t matter.
Managers can continually evolve.
Context, pressures and the big picture
The early results are actually more complicated than the table suggests.
The results are unacceptable. There’s no point in pretending otherwise.
But context matters.
In the game against Hibernian, Rangers lost 2-1 despite having 9 shots on goal to Hibernian’s 2. They also suffered disruption in the first half when Cermiti was taken off on a stretcher.
This doesn’t mean failure is acceptable.
But it does show that this situation doesn’t have to be a team completely devoid of ideas or effort. Rangers looked fragmented and vulnerable but there were periods where the underlying performance was better than the results suggested.
The job now is to turn those periods into consistent performances and ultimately wins.
This is perhaps his greatest strength.
Rangers don’t need someone to spend six months learning what Scottish football is.
They don’t need another coach who needs an entirely new squad to play a certain European style.
They need someone who understands the Premier League, understands the pressures of competing against Celtic and understands how to pull off ugly wins in tough away games.
McGinnis has operated in this environment for years.
He also understands that the Rangers can’t simply show up and expect teams to capitulate.
Over the course of 38 league games, this knowledge could prove to be extremely valuable.
There’s a bigger problem: Managers can’t solve every problem.
One of the easiest things to do in football is to blame the coach.
It’s also one of the least useful.
There have been significant changes to the Rangers recruitment. There are injuries. Some players are adapting to a new league and a new club. Some players haven’t found their feet yet. The team still has some positions to strengthen.
McInnes himself has called for further support in the transfer market.
If the Rangers believe their recruiting strategy is the right one, then the manager must be given the players they need to execute that strategy.
If Rangers think the team is good enough, then McInnes must be given time to make it work.
Another scenario that is unlikely to happen is that the club blames the manager for structural problems, fires him, hires someone else, and then starts the whole process over again.
That’s exactly how the Rangers ended up here.
Rangers chief executive Jim Gillespie recently compared McInnes to Jurgen Klopp when explaining the club’s vision, describing him as a manager who wants aggressive, front-foot football and stressing the need for patience.
Clearly, no one thinks McInnes is the next Klopp.
But there is an important principle behind this comparison.
Klopp didn’t transform Liverpool overnight.
Great teams take recruiting, coaching, culture, and time.
The Rangers spent too long expecting immediate results from every new coach and then reacting when those results didn’t come immediately.
Maybe a more radical approach this time would be to do something very simple:
Give the manager time.
There’s a reason McInnis got a three-year deal.
If Rangers truly believe he is the right man to lead the club, that belief will not disappear after four games.
No doubt there will be more bad performances to come.
There will be more frustrating draws.
There will be players who don’t work out.
There will be tactical decisions that supporters disagree with.
That’s football.
The question isn’t whether McGinnis will make a mistake.
He will.
The question is whether he can build a Rangers team that can consistently win throughout the season.
There’s nothing in his career to suggest he shouldn’t get a chance to try.
No one should be telling Rangers supporters to settle for mediocrity.
Standards must be kept extremely high.
Rangers should look forward to challenging for the Premier League. They should look forward to competing in Europe. They should expect to win trophies.
But high standards and impatience are not the same thing.
The club can demand improvements while still supporting the manager.
McInnes needs to get Rangers a quick win, especially with a crucial league play-off tie against Jablonec looming. But he also needs time to build something that will last in the coming weeks.
Four games is a terrible time to judge a rebuild.
Evidence from Hearts shows McInnes can build a competitive football team.
The evidence from Rangers’ recent history suggests that continued managerial change doesn’t work.
And the reality for the team right now is that it’s still being built.
So, yes, criticize Derek McGinnis.
Demand better performance.
Question his tactics.
Questioning his team selection.
Demand more from players.
But don’t confuse a bad start with evidence of a bad appointment.
The Rangers have been searching for years for their next head coach who can solve all their problems at once.
Maybe what they really need is to finally support a manager long enough to get the job done.
Derek McGinnis should be that manager.
Discuss rumors and transfers on our page
Discuss rumors and transfers on our page
Discuss rumors and transfers on our page
Discuss rumors and transfers on our page
.